4/23/2021 0 Comments Play Against Deep Blue
Blacks only chance of counterplay is to activate his bishop by.e4, but Deep Blue cuts the rope which might have saved the drowning Kasparov.Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future.
Further information can be found in our data protection declaration. Depending on their intended use, cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies, analysis cookies and marketing cookies. You can decide which cookies to use by selecting the appropriate options below. Please note that your selection may affect the functionality of the service. Here we take a close look at the most controversial move from game two, that prompted Kasparov to accuse the Deep Blue team of cheating. Plus ChessBase Magazine (DVD magazine) and CB Premium membership for 1 year. And the current Komodo 14 has been clearly improved over its predecessor. The subject was a few of the moves that stood out for a variety of reasons, such as a bug in game one of the 1997 match, and a move in game two that Kasparov found so unbelievable that he accused the Deep Blue team of cheating. The allegation was that a grandmaster, presumably a top rival, had been behind the move. While the computer played moves that baffled humans, the number of moves a grandmaster would outright scoff at were dwindling and could only be judged as eccentric. Todays best engines are actually no different, just stronger. It has inspired books, documentaries, and theatrical productions. Looking over the games with a top engine such as Komodo 8, and comparing with the computer logs, sheds new light, and even reveals a missed win by Kasparov. So the engines agree with Deep Blues choice, is that all Not quite. They were notoriously materialistic, and a tactic used by a player such as Kasparov, who would get deep into the head of his opponent, was to bait the machine with a poisoned pawn, allowing him to direct the game in a direction of his choosing. The problem is that the most direct method is far less than optimal. As noted by grandmaster John Nunn, who annotated the game then and whose notes can be found among the tens of thousands of commented games in MegaDatabase. Event New York Man-Machine Site New York Date 1997.05.04 Round 2 White Deep Blue Black Kasparov, Garry Result 1-0 ECO C93 BlackElo 2785 Annotator John Nunn SetUp 1 FEN r1r1q1k16p1p2b1p1p1p1PpP2PPp52P4PR1B2QP1R5K1 w - - 0 36 PlyCount 6 EventDate 1997.05. EventType match EventRounds 6 EventCountry USA Source ChessBase SourceDate 1997.11.17 It would be wrong to play 36. Qb6 Rd8 (36. Bc7 2 37. Qe6 Kh7 38. Qxe8 wins) 37. Rab8 38. Qxa6 e4 when, at the cost of two pawns, Black has developed considerable counterplay based on.Qe5 and possibly.e3. However, this is again a remarkable move by Deep Blue; most computers (including Fritz and Hiarcs) go for the material without hesitation. Did Deep Blue reject this line based on very deep analysis, is there some subtle programming involved 1-0. It played the very strong 36.axb5 axb5 and 37.Be4 to which Nunn comments, A cruel move.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |